Working Flip Headlights Rc Car

The British Labour Party and social positions

Ed Miliband, forty newly elected leader of British Labour Party, is a supporter of organizations " grassroots, imagining a party more open and dynamic applications for renewal in placing side from the company and building a party that works for people. The young secretary said: "We must reduce the deficit, but we must do much more ... "Reduce the growing inequity between rich and poor, which not only harms the poor, but the proper flow of money and then all".

A theme that runs through all of the growing inequalities that Western countries. If we think we can recall that Italy Valletta in the golden years of Fiat Gains received a ten times higher than a worker, but today it feels Marchionne a hundred times.

Inequalities new face with new forms of work: project workers, temporary employment, VAT and demand protection and make urgent representation to the birth of a new reform of the European and Italian linked to new protections that go beyond the old idea of "class struggle". Consider, for example, the issue raised by Ichino on the design of a single contract of "input" to the problem of tax reforms and large families to support the employees themselves.

This is a new challenge, "inter-" that awaits the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party must be able to intercept even these new instances from the weaker groups in Italian society that can not be attributed to the traditional trade unions, to put it Ermanno Gorrieri "nothing is more unjust than to divide equally between unequal."

Miliband in Britain in the case thinks that "social radicalism" should be rediscovered and closer to the world of voluntary associations ("grassroots").

The new Labour leader seems to want to mitigate, but not without appeal to condemn the liberal emphasis of New Labour Lair is proposing a "capitalism for the people." Ed Miliband praised the role the Socialist Movement "Christian" plays in the same Labour Party.

We, perhaps remembering the contribution that Dossetti, Fanfani, Lazzati Vanoni and gave the history of this country, we should go back to think of anything more than just "open up" to social justice.

should, in fact, urgent reflection on themes such as "bonuses" of employees to be tied to local union and bargaining for specific companies.

Social justice, economic development also accompanied by sacrifices and austerity policies are the "new frontiers" throughout the European left and the Italian Democratic Party.

Alessandro Natali

Snowmobile Partsjohndeere

The collapse of the Second Republic is not made in the reforms

In 1994 one of the flagships of the campaign was the abolition of the Forza Italy "withholding agent", unfortunately it did nothing. So in 1998 the Radicals turned to the European Court, sponsored by a tax known by the name of Giulio Tremonti, unjust and unfair to declare the obligation of "withholding agent" for companies. The High Court gave reason to the applicants, because the employers do not had found no benefit from this obligation imposed on them by the state. However, the issue has remained a dead letter and the argument is even released by the campaign. This is one of the examples that could be done to show how and what these last 20 years of Italian political and social life is a failure.

What we expected, after Italy's reconstruction boom, welfare and the conflicts between different visions (North Atlantic Treaty vs Warsaw Pact) was an Italy finally normal and modern.

The thing did not seem impossible. It was necessary to sort and rearrange the responsibilities of Provinces (or even abolish them!) To merge many of the Italian municipalities (the vast majority!) Under 5 thousand inhabitants, to liberalize the market and begin to combat tax evasion with the only system that works, namely in force in the U.S. (of course in a progressive and non-traumatic).

addition was to be the question of the professional and dealt with some seriousness of the leviathan legificazione Italian taking a terrible warning to the precept of the philosopher and jurist Bruno Leoni, "where there is legislated, there is less freedom, "contends that the Commission Cassese in 1996 in the beautiful country, there were already more than 200 thousand.

What happened instead in the last twenty years? The middle class, as evidenced by all the indicators system has been greatly impoverished, practices in order to start a business and keep it in place have been further complicated becoming increasingly expensive. We have all forgotten the only serious reform ever undertaken in the public sector (the Bassanini) and, instead of reducing it, we have given more space to the State in everyone's life. An example? My grandfather was a farmer if he were still alive today, every time I had to dig a pit on his farm where he disposed of would then declare the land would be removed and maybe even some hard-working authorities prepared to make him pay for disposal as "special waste".

Richard Bean

Association President Culturidea Pistoia

Liver Cancer Prognosis Stage 4

After the "bunga bunga "and the catastrophe of bad government of the center-right PD is 25%. A discussion of some proposals.

The PD at 25 % is certainly an anomaly! is a fact that should give pause to every democrat that contrasts with the results of failed policies of the center right and the scandals of which we are astonished spectators.

The Bank of Italy that has occurred in the third quarter of 2010, GDP slowed to 0.3 per cent on the previous period and that the economic activity, particularly industrial production, it would be greatly weakened. The same behavior of household consumption has been confirmed in a cautious, reflecting the weakness of disposable income and the outlook uncertain about the condition of the labor market. The Bank of Italy also points out that employment is still not recovered, confirming that the reduction is more pronounced among young people.

In short, this is a complete debacle of who governs Italy.

The image of the center-right does not improve even for the well-known "party" of the premier. "Just the idea" - writes Tarquin director of the Future - "a man who sits at the top of state institutions is involved in the stories of prostitution, and worse yet, child prostitution hurts and upsets." The same Cardinal Bagnasco, president of CEI, does not comment, saying: "He has already spoken Future." Even on the image we see, then, that the conduct of Silvio Berlusconi begin to raise doubts, personal assessment is still too timid, in the same Italian Episcopal Conference.

Given this situation tell us what the political polls?

• center-right (PDL + + the right Northern League): 42.5% - Central (UDV, FLI, MPA, API): 14.0% - Centre-(PD, IDV, SEL, FED.SIN and other center-left): 40.0% - Movement 5 star + Other: 3.5% (IPR Marketing for the Republic with as many as 19,000 interviews - January 19, 2011);
• PD lost between December 2010 and January 2011 0, 4% resulting in an intention to vote 24.3% of the sample (EMG TG La7 January 18, 2011).

Then Silvio Berlusconi and his center-right , despite the disastrous results and embarrassing situations, can postpone their defeat in the political scene.

This means that in our country there is a difficulty in the affirmation of a credible political alternative .

The PD, which is otherwise a party size matter, it fails totally to intercept the disappointment of the PDL, which are, apparently, to strengthen the lines of the undecided, those who abstain at most of the "third pole".

The PD had lost its vocation and seeking major alliances, sometimes difficult to implement, likely to arise in a subordinate position, despite being the subject numerically essential political and cultural alternative to the "berluconismo.

I believe that the region has, however, Bersani, but Veltroni and Renzi, when they say that it must be from a draft of a new Italy, a modern, progressive, supportive and reformist.

Italy will be the idea that we want to find consensus, seeking alliances with all those forces who want to govern our country so different from what has been done by the Berlusconi government - Tremonti - Bossi.

be progressives and reformers not mean to condemn the minority in defense of a class or a social component, but implies a conscious responsibility to take charge of all human society, local, national and global, giving answers that can advance the individual and society in accordance with the ideals of justice, freedom and solidarity.

be progressive and reformist means not just tackle a bad innovation, but also not to take it on to opponents of the change in the protection of the status quo.

Being progress and reforms leading to speak out , considering the debate and discussion as time for reaching a firm proposal for the government.

In this phase of "agony" of Italy we discuss some essential elements of an alternative project in Italy.

In front of the government's silence on the case FIAT believe that the world of social relations and representation of all stakeholders must work to "change" their ways of behavior. We must be clear that employer and employee are bound by a common destiny. It is therefore imperative to give Start to more advanced forms of economic democracy, allowing employees to participate in company profits and "Governance" of the same (public companies, pension funds etc.)..

Opposite all'ipocrita cultural squalor of Berlusconi and friends who offer themselves as "champions" of the family must be carriers of clear policies to support families : introduction of a fair system of taxation in our family quotient ; support to families with economic difficulties of health enhancing social experiences of the third sector. At the same time we must give protect the rights and duties of people permanently living , making our own, for example, former DICO bill of Bindi.

In front of the non-government responses to the crisis of small and medium-sized Italian entrepreneurs who we must understand that in the midst of economic difficulties they wonder why half of their work should go to fund a state away and inefficient. The federalism, we must become our own flag, but a federal solidarity, responsibility, not a type of centralism regionalistic "boss".

In front of a culture and private-monopoly of the current system of government Italian, we strongly support the protection of water as a common good of humanity , but also the management of the service industry, the role of local governments in decisions of custody and the need for an adjustment and strong public independent.

front of the increasingly urgent nuclear recipe submitted reply of the Berlusconi government in the first place with proposals for fuel efficiency, lower costs for families and businesses, and development of renewable sources. Several scientific organizations argue that you can save about 30% of the energy we consume today, particularly heat. Just projects and measures for energy efficiency in homes and businesses can, as evidenced by tax incentives, strengthen the green economy and our industrial system.

These are points of reflection for me that clearly should be present in our Project Italy.

Looking at our own house we must not fear confrontation: Berlinguer and the PCI Napolitano discussed in DC and Moro Fanfani. Only where the parties do not argue bad things can happen.

Carlo Bartolini

Is Dark Brown Stool Black Stool?

For a law on the party form

In recent years we have witnessed a general erosion of the role of parties in democratic function provided for in Article 49 of the Constitution.

The question of "legal status of parties" is widely debated and largely unresolved until the beginning of the Republic.

It was then the parties to recognize a different role from that played in pre-fascist.

the concern not to return to the liberal scheme was sensitive axes Dossetti Joseph, who in the course of the work of the Constituent Assembly declared its orientation in favor of a legislative framework in the organization of political parties, noting " that democracy today is moving towards an address other than the formalistic structure of parliamentary democracy than fifty years ago, address the need to interpret and convey because of the possibility of discipline and consolidation of this new democratic reality will depend on the possibility of the existence of democracy .

At the same time in the same period De Gasperi, the issue was that the unchecked power of the parties degenerated to the point of stifling the autonomy of civil society, such as selecting persons to be entrusted with tasks such as applications and only on the basis of party loyalty and not on the basis of the recognition of the professionalism, respect and consensus.

So good to see the Italian democracy was born with this genesis: the emergence of political parties first and then the state.

Long citizenship has resulted in the affirmation of belonging ideological party with all that this has generated is derived in terms of its reaction with oligarchic populist politics and a widespread lack of political ethics and culture of citizenship. The Democratic Party

also born in the second republic, with this focus back to the citizens the "primacy of politics" through the direct involvement with the primaries and the life "regulated by law" in the parties.

the Reform Treaty of the Democratic Party this is also to insist on a law governing the lives of citizens participation in the life of parties and electoral legislation consistent with our constitutional values.

Back to the values \u200b\u200bof our "Republican Constitution" also serves to guide our political process.

Alessandro Natali